Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GEM vs GSJY

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

GSJY

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$84M

Key differences

Both GEM and GSJY are equity ETFs. GEM charges 0.35% a year and GSJY 0.25%. The main difference: GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; GSJY uses index tracking.

  • GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; GSJY uses index tracking.
  • GEM covers emerging markets; GSJY covers the Asia-Pacific region.
  • GSJY costs 0.10% less per year.
  • GEM is much larger than GSJY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, GEM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

GEMGSJY
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.25%
Fund size (AUM)$1.7B$84M
Since20152016
Dividend yield1.85%1.75%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsasia pacific
Strategyindex enhancedindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+41.2%+25.9%
CAGR 3Y+21.9%+18.4%
CAGR 5Y+6.6%+8.4%
Sharpe 3Y1.000.80
Volatility 1Y20.62%19.75%
Max drawdown-37.02%-32.53%

Similar to GEM and GSJY