Screener
GEM vs GXUS
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF
Key differences
- GXUS costs 0.17% less per year.
- GEM covers emerging markets markets; GXUS covers global.
- GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; GXUS uses index tracking.
- GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEM | GXUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $607M |
| Since | 2015 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 2.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.2% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 16.25% |
| Max drawdown | -37.02% | -13.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEM and GXUS
Explore further