Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GEME vs APUE

Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF vs ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF

GEME

Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF

Pacific Capital Partners Limited

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$265M

APUE

ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF

Active Passive Funds

Annual cost

0.31%

Fund size

$2.4B

Key differences

  • APUE costs 0.44% less per year.
  • APUE is significantly larger than GEME — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

GEMEAPUE
Annual cost (TER)0.75%0.31%
Fund size (AUM)$265M$2.4B
Since20252023
Dividend yield4.11%0.79%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+72.0%+30.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+22.9%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A1.24
Volatility 1Y20.99%12.36%
Max drawdown-16.86%-18.83%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to GEME and APUE