Screener
GEME vs EEMS
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- GEME follows a active selection strategy; EEMS uses index tracking.
- EEMS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEME | EEMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $452M |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.0% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.99% | 16.93% |
| Max drawdown | -16.86% | -48.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEME and EEMS
Explore further