Screener
GEME vs IEMG
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- IEMG costs 0.66% less per year.
- IEMG is significantly larger than GEME — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEME follows a active selection strategy; IEMG uses index tracking.
- IEMG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEME | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $151.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.0% | +44.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.99% | 19.02% |
| Max drawdown | -16.86% | -38.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEME and IEMG
Explore further