Screener
GEME vs EMB
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF vs iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMB costs 0.36% less per year.
- EMB is significantly larger than GEME — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEME is classified as equity, while EMB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GEME follows a active selection strategy; EMB uses index tracking.
- EMB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEME | EMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $14.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 5.06% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.0% | +11.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.99% | 5.56% |
| Max drawdown | -16.86% | -28.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEME and EMB
Explore further