Screener
GEME vs EMBD
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.36% less per year.
- GEME is classified as equity, while EMBD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EMBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEME | EMBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $256M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 5.67% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.0% | +10.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.99% | 6.04% |
| Max drawdown | -16.86% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEME and EMBD
Explore further