Screener
GEME vs EMC
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF
Key differences
- EMC costs 0.10% less per year.
- GEME is significantly larger than EMC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEME | EMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $61M |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 0.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.0% | +30.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.99% | 20.21% |
| Max drawdown | -16.86% | -18.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEME and EMC
Explore further