Screener
GEME vs GGM
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF vs GGM Macro Alignment ETF
Key differences
- GEME costs 0.19% less per year.
- GEME is significantly larger than GGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEME | GGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.94% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $18M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +80.5% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.12% | 11.32% |
| Max drawdown | -16.86% | -19.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEME and GGM
Explore further