Screener
GEME vs EEMA
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
- EEMA costs 0.26% less per year.
- EEMA is significantly larger than GEME — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEME follows a active selection strategy; EEMA uses index tracking.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEME | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.0% | +46.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.99% | 19.95% |
| Max drawdown | -16.86% | -44.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEME and EEMA
Explore further