Screener
GEME vs XCNY
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.56% less per year.
- GEME is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEME follows a active selection strategy; XCNY uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEME | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $9M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.0% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.99% | 16.39% |
| Max drawdown | -16.86% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEME and XCNY
Explore further