Screener
XCNY vs EMM
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.47% less per year.
- EMM is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XCNY follows a index tracking strategy; EMM uses active selection.
- EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCNY | EMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $58M |
| Since | 2024 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 0.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.6% | +54.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.39% | 21.25% |
| Max drawdown | -19.70% | -21.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCNY and EMM
Explore further