Screener
GEND vs CGIC
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- GEND costs 0.16% less per year.
- CGIC is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEND is classified as alternative, while CGIC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GEND follows a option income strategy; CGIC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEND | CGIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 1.38% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.6% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.70% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -6.39% | -13.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEND and CGIC
Explore further