Screener
GEND vs DIVS
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- GEND costs 0.07% less per year.
- DIVS is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEND is classified as alternative, while DIVS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GEND covers north america markets; DIVS covers global.
- GEND follows a option income strategy; DIVS uses active selection.
- DIVS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEND | DIVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $39M |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 1.75% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.6% | +11.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.70% | 10.54% |
| Max drawdown | -6.39% | -29.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEND and DIVS
Explore further