Screener
GEND vs EQIN
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF
Key differences
- EQIN is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEND is classified as alternative, while EQIN is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GEND follows a option income strategy; EQIN uses index tracking.
- EQIN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEND | EQIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $276M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 1.92% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.72% | 10.39% |
| Max drawdown | -6.39% | -42.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEND and EQIN
Explore further