Screener
GEND vs INEQ
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs Columbia International Equity Income ETF
Key differences
- GEND costs 0.07% less per year.
- INEQ is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEND is classified as alternative, while INEQ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GEND covers north america markets; INEQ covers global.
- GEND follows a option income strategy; INEQ uses index tracking.
- INEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEND | INEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $80M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 2.40% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +29.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.72% | 13.63% |
| Max drawdown | -6.39% | -40.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEND and INEQ
Explore further