Screener
GENW vs CGIC
Genter Capital International Dividend ETF vs Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- GENW costs 0.16% less per year.
- CGIC is significantly larger than GENW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GENW follows a index tracking strategy; CGIC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GENW | CGIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.64% | 1.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.78% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -14.36% | -13.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GENW and CGIC
Explore further