Screener
GFGF vs FDRS
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.17% less per year.
- GFGF is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GFGF follows a active selection strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| GFGF | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $77M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.22% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | — |
| Max drawdown | -27.99% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GFGF and FDRS
Explore further