Screener
GFGF vs FIVA
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- FIVA costs 0.48% less per year.
- FIVA is significantly larger than GFGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GFGF covers north america markets; FIVA covers global.
- GFGF follows a active selection strategy; FIVA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FIVA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GFGF | FIVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $533M |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.22% | 2.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.5% | +36.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | 15.28% |
| Max drawdown | -27.99% | -39.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GFGF and FIVA
Explore further