Screener
GFGF vs FQAL
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Key differences
- FQAL costs 0.51% less per year.
- FQAL is significantly larger than GFGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GFGF follows a active selection strategy; FQAL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FQAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FQAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GFGF | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.22% | 1.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.5% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +20.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | 11.32% |
| Max drawdown | -27.99% | -33.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GFGF and FQAL
Explore further