Screener
GFGF vs PY
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Principal Value ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.51% less per year.
- PY is significantly larger than GFGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GFGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GFGF | PY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $212M |
| Since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.22% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.5% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +13.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | 10.72% |
| Max drawdown | -27.99% | -45.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GFGF and PY
Explore further