Screener
GFGF vs VTV
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF vs Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VTV costs 0.63% less per year.
- VTV is significantly larger than GFGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GFGF follows a active selection strategy; VTV uses index tracking.
- VTV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GFGF | VTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $237.8B |
| Since | 2021 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.22% | 1.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.5% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | 10.21% |
| Max drawdown | -27.99% | -36.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GFGF and VTV
Explore further