Screener
GGM vs AOK
GGM Macro Alignment ETF vs iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOK costs 0.79% less per year.
- AOK is significantly larger than GGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GGM is classified as equity, while AOK is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- AOK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GGM | AOK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.94% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $756M |
| Since | 2023 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 3.32% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.0% | +12.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.32% | 5.78% |
| Max drawdown | -19.68% | -18.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GGM and AOK
Explore further