Screener
GGM vs RHRX
GGM Macro Alignment ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF
Key differences
- GGM costs 0.44% less per year.
- GGM is classified as equity, while RHRX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GGM follows a active selection strategy; RHRX uses option income.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GGM | RHRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.94% | 1.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $34M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.1% | +42.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.32% | 13.30% |
| Max drawdown | -19.68% | -25.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GGM and RHRX
Explore further