Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RHRX vs MOOD

RH Tactical Rotation ETF vs Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

RHRX

RH Tactical Rotation ETF

Adaptive ETF

Annual cost

1.38%

Fund size

$34M

MOOD

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

Relative Sentiment

Annual cost

0.73%

Fund size

$116M

Key differences

  • MOOD costs 0.65% less per year.
  • MOOD is significantly larger than RHRX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • RHRX is classified as alternative, while MOOD is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
  • RHRX follows a option income strategy; MOOD uses active selection.
  • Over the last 3 years, RHRX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RHRXMOOD
Annual cost (TER)1.38%0.73%
Fund size (AUM)$34M$116M
Since20122022
Dividend yield0.00%0.36%
Asset classalternativemixed asset
Regionnorth america
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1Y+39.5%+36.9%
CAGR 3Y+22.4%+20.3%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.091.43
Volatility 1Y13.26%14.13%
Max drawdown-25.33%-14.34%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to RHRX and MOOD