Screener
GHYB vs DUSB
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- DUSB is significantly larger than GHYB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GHYB follows a index tracking strategy; DUSB uses active selection.
- GHYB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GHYB | DUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $124M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 7.00% | 4.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.2% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.53% | 0.43% |
| Max drawdown | -21.48% | -0.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GHYB and DUSB
Explore further