Screener
GIGB vs TAXF
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- GIGB costs 0.19% less per year.
- GIGB follows a index tracking strategy; TAXF uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, GIGB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GIGB | TAXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $907M | $627M |
| Since | 2017 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.70% | 3.82% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | +0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.26 | 0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.42% | 3.09% |
| Max drawdown | -22.25% | -13.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GIGB and TAXF
Explore further