Screener
GIGL vs PCRB
Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF vs Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
Key differences
- GIGL costs 0.07% less per year.
- GIGL is significantly larger than PCRB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GIGL follows a active selection strategy; PCRB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GIGL | PCRB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $172M | $7M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 9.54% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.80% |
| Max drawdown | -3.13% | -7.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GIGL and PCRB
Explore further