Screener
PCRB vs GBND
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - vs Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- GBND costs 0.11% less per year.
- GBND is significantly larger than PCRB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PCRB follows a index tracking strategy; GBND uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCRB | GBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $480M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 9.54% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.79% | — |
| Max drawdown | -7.20% | -2.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCRB and GBND
Explore further