Screener
GII vs IFRA
State Street SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IFRA costs 0.10% less per year.
- IFRA is significantly larger than GII — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GII covers global markets; IFRA covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IFRA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GII has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GII | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $989M | $4.1B |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.85% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +30.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +20.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.60% | 14.79% |
| Max drawdown | -42.84% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GII and IFRA
Explore further