Screener
IFRA vs IGF
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IFRA costs 0.09% less per year.
- IFRA covers north america markets; IGF covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IFRA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IFRA | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.1B | $10.7B |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.8% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.6% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.79% | 10.43% |
| Max drawdown | -41.06% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IFRA and IGF
Explore further