Screener
GII vs PAVE
State Street SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF vs Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Key differences
- GII costs 0.07% less per year.
- PAVE is significantly larger than GII — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GII covers global markets; PAVE covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, PAVE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GII has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GII | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $989M | $13.4B |
| Since | 2007 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.85% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +16.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.60% | 18.75% |
| Max drawdown | -42.84% | -44.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GII and PAVE
Explore further