Screener
PAVE vs IGF
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.08% less per year.
- PAVE covers north america markets; IGF covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, PAVE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PAVE | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $10.7B |
| Since | 2017 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.2% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.2% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.75% | 10.43% |
| Max drawdown | -44.08% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PAVE and IGF
Explore further