Screener
GII vs RIFR
State Street SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- GII costs 0.19% less per year.
- GII is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GII follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
- GII has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GII | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $989M | $42M |
| Since | 2007 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.85% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.60% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -42.84% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GII and RIFR
Explore further