Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GIND vs GEM

Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

GIND

Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$157M

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

Key differences

Both GIND and GEM are equity ETFs. GIND charges 0.75% a year and GEM 0.35%. The main difference: GIND follows a active selection strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.

  • GIND follows a active selection strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
  • GEM costs 0.40% less per year.
  • GEM is much larger than GIND. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GINDGEM
Annual cost (TER)0.75%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$157M$1.7B
Since20252015
Dividend yield0.00%1.85%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y-13.8%+41.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+21.9%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.6%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.00
Volatility 1Y16.37%20.62%
Max drawdown-22.97%-37.02%

Similar to GIND and GEM