Screener
GINN vs FORH
Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF vs Formidable ETF
Key differences
- GINN costs 0.69% less per year.
- GINN is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GINN is classified as equity, while FORH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GINN follows a index tracking strategy; FORH uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, GINN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GINN | FORH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $206M | $20M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.8% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | +2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.09% | 15.64% |
| Max drawdown | -41.25% | -20.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GINN and FORH
Explore further