Screener
GINN vs GDOC
Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
Key differences
- GINN costs 0.25% less per year.
- GINN is significantly larger than GDOC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GINN follows a index tracking strategy; GDOC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, GINN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GINN | GDOC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $206M | $21M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.1% | +8.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.8% | +0.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | -0.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.09% | 15.51% |
| Max drawdown | -41.25% | -31.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GINN and GDOC
Explore further