Screener
GINN vs GKAT
Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- GINN costs 0.09% less per year.
- GINN follows a index tracking strategy; GKAT uses active selection.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GINN | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $206M | $158M |
| Since | 2020 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.09% | — |
| Max drawdown | -41.25% | -10.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GINN and GKAT
Explore further