Screener
GINN vs KAT
Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- GINN costs 0.25% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than GINN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GINN follows a index tracking strategy; KAT uses active selection.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GINN | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $206M | $688M |
| Since | 2020 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.09% | — |
| Max drawdown | -41.25% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GINN and KAT
Explore further