Screener
GK vs ADPV
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF vs Adaptiv Select ETF
Key differences
- GK costs 0.23% less per year.
- ADPV is significantly larger than GK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ADPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GK | ADPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $171M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.07% | 0.68% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.5% | +36.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +26.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.39% | 24.12% |
| Max drawdown | -47.72% | -22.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GK and ADPV
Explore further