Screener
GK vs SPDF
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF vs Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF
Key differences
- SPDF costs 0.08% less per year.
- GK is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GK | SPDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $5M |
| Since | 2021 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.07% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.39% | — |
| Max drawdown | -47.72% | -1.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GK and SPDF
Explore further