Screener
GK vs FORH
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF vs Formidable ETF
Key differences
- GK costs 0.42% less per year.
- GK is classified as equity, while FORH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GK follows a active selection strategy; FORH uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, GK has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GK | FORH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $20M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.07% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.5% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.39% | 15.64% |
| Max drawdown | -47.72% | -20.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GK and FORH
Explore further