Screener
GK vs WZRD
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF vs Opportunistic Trader ETF
Key differences
- GK costs 0.23% less per year.
- GK is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GK is classified as equity, while WZRD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GK follows a active selection strategy; WZRD uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| GK | WZRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $4M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.07% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.39% | — |
| Max drawdown | -47.72% | -71.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GK and WZRD
Explore further