Screener
GK vs SAMT
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- SAMT costs 0.11% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than GK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GK is classified as equity, while SAMT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GK follows a active selection strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GK | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $619M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.07% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.5% | +46.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.39% | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -47.72% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GK and SAMT
Explore further