Screener
GKAT vs DFIC
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF
Key differences
- DFIC costs 0.37% less per year.
- DFIC is significantly larger than GKAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | DFIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $13.6B |
| Since | 2014 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 2.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.88% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -24.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and DFIC
Explore further