Screener
GKAT vs FFND
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
- GKAT costs 0.41% less per year.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $99M |
| Since | 2014 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -47.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and FFND
Explore further