Screener
GKAT vs GIGB
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GIGB costs 0.51% less per year.
- GIGB is significantly larger than GKAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT is classified as equity, while GIGB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GKAT follows a active selection strategy; GIGB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | GIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $907M |
| Since | 2014 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.40% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -22.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and GIGB
Explore further