Screener
GKAT vs GSIG
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
Key differences
- GSIG costs 0.51% less per year.
- GKAT is significantly larger than GSIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT is classified as equity, while GSIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GKAT follows a active selection strategy; GSIG uses index tracking.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | GSIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $9M |
| Since | 2014 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 4.43% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.86% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -9.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and GSIG
Explore further