Screener
GKAT vs GINN
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
Key differences
- GINN costs 0.09% less per year.
- GKAT follows a active selection strategy; GINN uses index tracking.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GKAT | GINN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $206M |
| Since | 2014 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.09% |
| Max drawdown | -10.41% | -41.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GKAT and GINN
Explore further