Skip to content
Screener

GKAT vs RYLD

Scharf Global Opportunity ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

GKAT

Scharf Global Opportunity ETF

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$165M

RYLD

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$1.3B

Key differences

GKAT is an equity ETF, while RYLD is an alternative ETF. GKAT charges 0.59% a year and RYLD 0.60%.

  • GKAT is an equity fund, while RYLD is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • GKAT follows a active selection strategy; RYLD uses option income.
  • GKAT covers global markets; RYLD covers North America.
  • RYLD is much larger than GKAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GKATRYLD
Annual cost (TER)0.59%0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$165M$1.3B
Since20142019
Dividend yield0.45%11.65%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1YN/A+20.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+7.4%
CAGR 5YN/A+2.5%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.34
Volatility 1Y10.71%
Max drawdown-10.41%-41.52%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GKAT and RYLD